On 16 April 2003, I released the report of the HIH Royal Commission into
the failure of the HIH Insurance Group. Since that time the Government
has implemented an enhanced governance structure for the Australian Prudential
Regulation Authority (APRA) and appointed three new APRA members from
1 July 2003.
The Government has also referred 56 possible breaches of the law to the
relevant agencies and committed funding of $42 million to ensure the
efficient investigation and prosecution of any civil or criminal charges
arising from the collapse of HIH.
The Royal Commissioner made 61 policy recommendations. The Government's
response to the 61 recommendations is attached. The findings and
recommendations of the report provide further opportunity to build on
the Government's regulatory reform agenda and to contribute to a more
stable and robust financial system.
Some of the recommendations fall under the responsibility of various
independent bodies such as APRA, the Australian Stock Exchange and the
Australian Accounting Standards Board. I have referred the relevant recommendations
to those bodies and asked them to carefully consider Justice Owen's recommendations
and advise me of their response.
Justice Owen also made a number of recommendations that deal with State
and Territory regulation and taxation of general insurance. I have written
to the States and Territories encouraging them to carefully consider
the recommendations of the report and to take appropriate action. The Government
is committed to continuing the existing meetings of Commonwealth and
State and Territory Ministers on Insurance, which has been meeting since
March 2002, to discuss matters of mutual interest between the Commonwealth,
States and Territories.
Justice Owen recommended that the Commonwealth Government extend prudential
regulation to all discretionary insurance-like products. In addition,
Justice Owen referred to insurance cover underwritten offshore, although
he made no specific recommendation in this respect. Some level of insurance
cover in the Australian market is currently provided by discretionary
mutual funds (DMFs) and direct offshore foreign insurers (DOFIs). However,
these entities are not subject to the same level of prudential regulation
by APRA as Australian authorised insurers.
To inform its consideration of the appropriate regulatory framework for
DMFs and DOFIs, the Government is commissioning a review to examine the
extent and nature of cover provided by DMFs and DOFIs.
The review will be headed by Mr Gary Potts, former Executive Director
of Markets Group, Department of the Treasury. The review will be
taking submissions and details of the review, including the terms of
reference, will be available on the Treasury website.
Recommendation 61 of the report proposed that the Commonwealth Government
introduce a scheme to support policyholders of insurance companies in
the event of the failure of any such company. The Government has supported
the development of a safe and efficient financial system by implementing
path-breaking reforms to the prudential regulation and corporate governance
frameworks. Underlying these frameworks is the principle that the health
of a financial institution is primarily the responsibility of its board
and management. Market discipline and prudential regulation reinforce
this responsibility. The Government is not, and should not be, responsible
for the financial promises of these institutions. The Government recognises,
however, that when failures occur the community can suffer extreme financial
hardship. At the time of the collapse of HIH, the Government moved quickly
to establish a support scheme.
The appropriateness of government intervention following financial institution
collapses should be considered in terms of its possible financial system-wide
impacts and consequences for the design of the regulatory framework.
These are complex matters. Moreover, the precise design of any guarantee,
its incentive properties and its associated financial costs warrant close
consideration.
With this in mind, the Government is commissioning a comprehensive study
to examine these issues. Professor Kevin Davis, Professor of Finance
at The University of Melbourne, has agreed to lead the study. Following
the completion of the study, Treasury will undertake a public consultation
process on possible policy options. The details of the study, including
the proposed process and terms of reference will also be available on
the Treasury website.
The Commission made a number of recommendations relating to corporate
governance and financial reporting. Some of these recommendations will
be implemented in the CLERP 9 draft legislation which is intended to
be released for public comment in October this year.
The terms of reference for the review of discretionary mutual funds and
direct offshore foreign insurers and further information about the review
will be available at http://dmfreview.treasury.gov.au
The terms of reference for the study of financial system guarantees and
further information about the study will be available at http://fsgstudy.treasury.gov.au
CANBERRA
12 September 2003
HIH RECOMMENDATIONS |
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE |
Recommendation 1 proposes that the
Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act), the relevant
accounting standards and the ASX Listing Rules relating to directors'
remuneration be reviewed to ensure they achieve clear and comprehensive
disclosure of all remuneration paid to directors. |
Accept. This recommendation is being
implemented under the CLERP 9 process. |
Recommendation 2 proposes that the
Corporations Act be changed to impose duties based on functions
rather than status (eg director or officer). |
Anomalies in the definition of officer
will be corrected in CLERP 9. The Government does not propose
to recast the duties of directors and officers at this time
but will ask the Companies and Markets Advisory Committee, taking
wider submissions, to review this question in light of the Royal
Commission's observations. |
Recommendation 3 proposes that
the Government broaden the membership of the AASB to include
non-accountants. |
Accept. Current legislation provides
for this to be implemented. The Government will write to the
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) about this matter. |
Recommendation 4 proposes that
Australia participate in the development of international accounting
standards. |
Accept. This recommendation is being
implemented through Australia's adoption of international accounting
standards. |
Recommendation 5 proposes that
Australia reserve the right to require more stringent accounting
standards that are not inconsistent with relevant international
standards. |
Accept. This recommendation reflects
the current situation. |
Recommendation 6 proposes that
the AASB alter its Urgent Issues Group (UIG) or create a separate
group to promptly issue binding rules on the interpretation
/ application of accounting standards; and that this group include
lawyers and users of financial statements. |
Accept. The Government will write
to the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the
FRC about this recommendation. |
Recommendation 7 proposes that
the accounting bodies encourage their members to consult independent
third parties or the UIG when there is disagreement with company
management about the interpretation or application of accounting
standards. |
Implementation of this recommendation
is an issue for the professional accounting bodies. The Government
will draw this recommendation to the attention of the accounting
bodies. The Government will consult the FRC and AASB regarding
the role of the Urgent Issues Group (UIG). |
Recommendation 8 proposes amendments
to accounting standard AASB 1023 Financial Reporting
of General Insurance Activities to correct a number of deficiencies
that were identified in the standard. |
The AASB's current work program provides
for a revision of AASB1023 as part of the program to converge
Australian standards with standards issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The AASB will be requested
to consider the terms of recommendation 8 as it continues to
work with the IASB in finalising the international standard
on insurance contracts. |
Recommendation 9 proposes that a standard
of independence for auditors should be contained in legislation
and professional standards. |
Accept. This recommendation is being
implemented under the CLERP 9 process. |
Recommendation 10 proposes that the
Corporations Act should be amended to require the board to provide
a statement in the annual report that identifies all non-audit
services provided by the audit firm and the fees applicable
to each item of work and explains why those non-audit services
do not compromise audit independence. |
Accept. This recommendation is being
implemented under the CLERP 9 process. |
Recommendation 11 proposes that the
CLERP 9 proposal for a "waiting period" of 2 years
before a former partner directly involved in the audit of a
client as a director or in senior management be extended. |
Accept. This recommendation is being
implemented under the CLERP 9 process. |
Recommendation 12 proposes that the
CLERP 9 proposal for rotation of the lead engagement partner
and review partner be extended to key senior audit personnel. |
CLERP 9 requires rotation of lead
engagement and review partners after 5 years. It is these audit
partners who are responsible for forming the final opinion on
the financial statements of the client. In these circumstances,
the Government does not consider that extending the rotation
requirement to parties subordinate to the lead engagement and
review partners will enhance auditor independence. |
Recommendation 13 proposes changes
to the content of the audit report and the inclusion of an audited
operating and financial review in the annual report. |
The Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board (AuASB) will be consulted about the proposals for the
audit report to contain comment on alternative accounting treatments,
disclosure regarding significant matters arising in the audit
process and for audit reports to be presented in plain English.
These requirements are better suited for inclusion in the auditing
standards rather than as prescriptive legislative requirements.
A requirement for an operating and financial review (otherwise
known as MD&A) is supported and it is intended that this
be included in the CLERP 9 legislation. As MD&A material
is descriptive in nature, it does not readily lend itself to
audit processes. |
Recommendation 14 proposes that
the Corporations Act be amended to require listed companies
to include a brief summary of the nature and scope of the audit
services provided by their auditor each year. |
This requirement is better suited
for inclusion in the auditing standards rather than being prescribed
in legislation. The AuASB will be consulted concerning an amendment
to the relevant auditing standard. |
Recommendation 15 proposes that
both the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and
the Institute of Actuaries of Australia introduce compulsory
certification of the completeness and accuracy of data. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA and the Institute of Actuaries of Australia. |
Recommendation 16 proposes that
the Institute of Actuaries of Australia and the APRA introduce
a requirement for more detailed disclosure of the exercise,
incidence and impact of subjective judgment and departure from
historical experience. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA and the Institute of Actuaries of Australia. |
Recommendation 17 proposes that
APRA extend the qualifications of the approved actuary to require
that they not be an employee or partner of the organisation
to which the approved auditor belongs. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA and the Institute of Actuaries of Australia. |
Recommendation 18 proposes changed
governance arrangements for APRA, including, replacing the non-executive
board with an executive group comprising of a CEO and 2-3 commissioners
and discontinuing the involvement of representatives from the
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and
the Reserve Bank of Australia on the board of APRA. |
The Government has amended the APRA
Act to implement an enhanced corporate governance structure
for APRA that took effect from 1 July 2003. The new members
and Chair and Deputy Chair of APRA commenced on 1 July 2003.
|
Recommendation 19 proposes that the
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 1998 (APRA
Act) be amended to provide the chief executive with the power
to establish an advisory board. |
The Government supports this recommendation
and will recommend to APRA that an Advisory Board be established. |
Recommendation 20 proposes that the
direct involvement of representatives of ASIC and the RBA in
the governance of APRA be discontinued. This will require amendment
of the APRA Act. |
The Government has amended the APRA
Act to implement an enhanced corporate governance structure
for APRA that took effect from 1 July 2003. The new members
and Chair and Deputy Chair of APRA commenced on 1 July 2003.
Representation of the Australian Securities and Investment Commission
(ASIC) and the Reserve Bank of Australia in the governance of
APRA has been discontinued. |
Recommendation 21 proposes that the
APRA chief executive urgently instigates a review of APRA's
organisational structure, balancing its cross-sectoral responsibilities
with accountability and knowledge of financial services. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 22 proposes that the
Commonwealth Government consider removing the requirement for
the Treasurer's agreement to operational decisions involving
APRA's prudential oversight of general insurers. |
The Government accepts the policy
intent of this recommendation and will remove the requirement
for APRA to seek the Treasurer's agreement to make operational
decisions which do not involve wider policy issues. |
Recommendation 23 proposes the Government
review the inconsistencies between the legislative provisions
for merit review under the Insurance Act 1973 and the
Banking Act 1959. |
The Government accepts this recommendation. |
Recommendation 24 proposes that APRA
implement a programme to build the skills of staff involved
in the supervision of general insurers. This should involve
a review of its human resource management policies to assess
APRA's competitiveness in the financial services sector labour
market. The review should take account of the adequacy of remuneration,
training and career structures as well as other steps to increase
APRA's attractiveness as an employer. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 25 proposes the Government
adopt a three-year rolling fund arrangement to set APRA's budget. |
This already occurs in practice under
existing funding arrangements. |
Recommendation 26 proposes that APRA
develop a more sceptical, questioning and, where necessary,
aggressive approach to its prudential supervision of general
insurers. Consultation, inquiry and constructive dialogue should
be balanced by firmness in its requirements and a preparedness
to enforce compliance with applicable standards. In particular,
APRA should take a firm approach to ensuring regulated entities'
timely compliance in the lodging of returns and the provision
of information. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 27 proposes that APRA
continue to develop and review processes, guidelines and training
to assist its staff in considering the appropriate approach
to take towards supervised entities in different situations. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 28 proposes that APRA
develop systems to encourage its staff and management continually
to question their assumptions, views and conclusions about the
financial viability of supervised entities, particularly on
the receipt of new information about an entity. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 29 proposes that APRA
develop an internal system for tracking all relevant information
concerning regulated entities. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 30 proposes that APRA
develop mechanisms to investigate the reinsurance arrangements
for general insurers on a random but frequent basis. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 31 proposes that
the effectiveness of the current memorandum of understanding
(MOU) between APRA and ASIC be reviewed; the processes for liaison,
coordination and exchange of information between APRA and ASIC
should be reviewed on a regular basis; to facilitate the exchange
of information, the Commonwealth Government should make a regulation
specifying ASIC for the purposes of s.56(5)(a) the APRA Act. |
The Government has already implemented
enhanced exchange of information arrangements between APRA and
ASIC through recent amendments to the APRA Act. ASIC is specified
for the purposes of the APRA Act.
The Government will refer the responsibility for reviewing the
existing memorandum of understanding (MOU) between APRA and
ASIC to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 32 proposes that
matters relating to the coordination of Commonwealth regulation
affecting the insurance industry be the province of the Commonwealth
Treasury. |
Accept. This already occurs in practice.
Treasury will continue to facilitate ongoing liaison, coordination
and exchange of information between regulators. |
Recommendation 33 proposes that coordination
of matters related to the regulation of the insurance industry
be addressed through the proposed ministerial council (see recommendation
54 below). |
Accept. Since March 2002 the Commonwealth
has regularly convened a meeting of Commonwealth and State and
Territories Insurance Ministers to discuss insurance matters
generally. The forum will continue to consider insurance matters
as they arise. |
Recommendations 34 deals with the
disclosure of information by authorised general insurers. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 35 proposes that information
that enables external users to make an informed assessment of
an insurer's outstanding claims provisions and reinsurance arrangements
be published by the insurer or APRA. APRA should develop reporting
returns for insurers that would enable this to occur if existing
returns are insufficient. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 36 proposes that insurers
be required to make greater disclosure of qualitative information
relating to their risk and reinsurance management strategies.
Other qualitative information - where the prospect of disclosure
may affect the quality of information provided to companies
- need not be disclosed. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 37 proposes that APRA
identify which regulatory activities should be disclosed publicly
and by what means. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 38 proposes that APRA
develop and promulgate a standard for the effective regulation
of authorised insurers that operate as part of a corporate group. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 39 proposes that APRA
monitor the financial condition of corporate groups, including
those with foreign operations. Pending the development of the
proposed prudential standard on supervision of corporate groups,
APRA should use existing powers to require groups to provide
any information it considers necessary to perform this role. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 40 proposes that APRA
take steps to ensure that it effectively exchanges with relevant
foreign regulators information and intelligence on the operations
of Australian insurers with international operations. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 41 proposes that APRA
modify the prudential standards to require the annual production
by an authorised general insurer's approved actuary of a report
on the overall financial condition of the insurer. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to APRA for its action. |
Recommendation 42 proposes that the
Commonwealth Government amend the Insurance Act 1973
to extend prudential regulation to all discretionary insurance-like
products - to the extent that it is possible to do so within
constitutional limits. |
The Government will commission a review
to examine the role of discretionary mutual funds in the insurance
market. The review will also include an examination of the role
of direct offshore foreign insurers in the insurance market.
Details of the review including the terms of reference will
be available on the Treasury website. |
Recommendation 43 proposes that the
Corporations Act be amended so that the APRA may apply
to wind up a company that is an authorised insurer if any of
the criteria specified in s.52(1)(aa), (ab) or (a) of the Insurance
Act 1973 are met. |
The Government accepts this recommendation. |
Recommendation 44 proposes that the
Corporations Act be amended to specify that the interests
of policyholders are interests to which the court should have
regard in deciding whether to make a winding-up order. |
The Government accepts this recommendation
and notes this already occurs in practice. |
Recommendations 45 proposes that the
Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) amend Listing Rule 3.1 to require-or
publish a guidance note making it clear-that price-sensitive
announcements have the approval of either the board or a delegate
of the board subject to ratification by the board. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to the Australian Stock Exchange for its action. |
Recommendation 46 proposes that the
ASX amend the Listing Rules to prohibit `blacklisting'-defined
as exclusion of a person or organisation from briefings by a
company or a pattern of such exclusion in the face of negative
reports on the company by those analysts over a specific period. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to the Australian Stock Exchange for its action. |
Recommendation 47 proposes that the
ASX clarify Listing Rule 11.1, so that it applies to any significant
change in the business or assets of a listed company, whether
it be by acquisition, disposal, amalgamation or otherwise. Further,
that the ASX amend the Listing Rules to define `significant
change', so that it encompasses financial and geographic factors
as well as the nature and scale of the company's business. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to the Australian Stock Exchange for its action. |
Recommendation 48 proposes that the
ASX amend Listing Rule 11.2, so that it applies to any disposal
of the whole or substantially the whole of the assets or operations
of a listed company. |
The Government will refer this recommendation
to the Australian Stock Exchange for its action. |
Recommendation 49 proposes that
APRA should become the sole prudential regulator of general
insurance. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 50 is that if
the States and Territories remain involved with prudential regulation,
that there be effective information exchange with APRA. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendations 51-52 propose that
the States and Territories reduce inconsistencies in their statutory
schemes, and that they apply relevant prudential requirements. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 53 proposes that the
States and Territories consider allowing greater price flexibility
in their statutory schemes. This is a matter that would be appropriate
for consideration by the proposed ministerial council. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 54 recommends
that the Commonwealth use a ministerial council to discuss and
resolve general insurance and perhaps other financial services
matters with the States. |
Accept. Since March 2002 the Commonwealth
has convened a meeting of Commonwealth and State and Territories
Insurance Ministers to discuss insurance matters generally.
The forum will continue to consider insurance matters as they
arise. |
Recommendation 55 is that the States
and Territories abolish stamp duty on general insurance products. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 56 is that those States
and Territories that have not already done so abolish fire services
levies on insurers. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 57 is that the States
and Territories exclude the cost of the GST for the purposes
of calculating stamp duties or any other state or territory
levies that are imposed on insurance premiums. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 58 is that governments
avoid imposing on insurers levies and other taxes that cannot
be passed on to policyholders. |
The Commonwealth will refer this recommendation
to the States and Territories for their consideration. |
Recommendation 59 is that the Income
Tax Assessment Act (ITAA) 1936 be amended to align it with the
modified accounting standards proposed. |
Australia is committed to adopting
international accounting standards and considers it appropriate
to await consideration by the AASB of recommendation 8 to examine
the behavioural impacts arising from any new model before aligning
the taxation treatment of general insurers with their accounting
treatment. |
Recommendation 60 is to amend the
law to make contributions to catastrophe reserves tax deductible,
and releases assessable for tax. |
Australia is committed to adopting
international accounting standards and considers it appropriate
to await consideration by the IASB of arrangements for catastrophe
reserves to examine the behavioural impacts arising from any
new model before aligning the taxation treatment of general
insurers with their accounting treatment. |
Recommendation 61 recommends the Commonwealth
Government introduce a systematic scheme to support policy holders
of insurance companies in the event of a failure. |
This matter was last considered under
the Financial System Inquiry (the Wallis Inquiry) which recommended
against establishing such a scheme. The Government will commission
a study by an eminent person into the merits of financial system
guarantees. The study will include how any guarantee might be
funded and how it might impact on consumers and incentives in
financial markets. Details of the study including the terms
of reference and how the study will be conducted will be available
on the Treasury website. |